icnlive

Oil prices climb more than 3% on Thursday, lifting traders after a steep recent decline. Brent crude futures rose $3.51, or 3.72

Trending Economy

Weakest level in a month for the U.S. dollar

Weakest level in a month for the U.S. dollar followed a fast change in market mood. Investors had prepared for deeper conflict, higher oil prices, and wider pressure across global trade. Once ceasefire headlines appeared, many funds cut defensive positions and moved back toward risk assets. The dollar had gained support earlier because traders saw lower damage for America than for Europe.

Japan and several European economies face heavier energy pressure when oil prices rise quickly. After the deal, oil dropped, and traders no longer chased safety with equal urgency. The dollar index then slipped as demand for defensive currency exposure faded across major desks. At the same time, the euro exchange rate pushed higher against the greenback during active trading. Sterling gains added another signal showing broader confidence had returned after days of conflict concern. Charu Chanana at Saxo Bank described the move as a classic relief reaction.

Her view matched price action across bonds, equities, and foreign exchange during the session. My analysis indicates traders now care more about policy timing than war headlines alone.

Weakest level in a month for the U.S. dollar reflects shifting trader focus

Attention now sits on central banks, since lower oil eases inflation pressure for major economies. Federal Reserve rate cuts returned to the market debate after crude prices fell from wartime peaks. Lower energy costs often support consumer spending and reduce pressure on company margins. Such changes matter because rate expectations often shape currency prices more than single headlines.

When traders expect an easier policy, a currency often loses part of its earlier yield support. For this reason, the latest dollar move reached beyond ceasefire relief alone. Markets also reviewed fresh odds for Federal Reserve rate cuts before the year’s end. Those bets rose after investors decided the oil shock looked smaller than feared. Across Europe, traders also trimmed expectations for stronger tightening from the European Central Bank. Such repricing helped the euro exchange rate extend gains through the session. Sterling gains followed similar logic, with a stronger appetite for risk and softer dollar demand.

A calmer energy picture also reduced concern around the Strait of Hormuz route. That route handles a huge share of seaborne oil, so disruption fears move markets fast.

Why did lower oil changed currency direction so quickly

Oil often sits at the center of currency pricing during geopolitical stress and military threats. When crude jumps, import-heavy economies face wider trade pressure and slower growth prospects. During earlier war fears, traders favored the dollar as a relative shelter from harm. America sells energy abroad, which often cushions external shocks better than major importers. Once the ceasefire terms lowered the immediate danger, traders reversed part of those emergency positions.

Stocks rebounded, bond yields adjusted, and safe-haven demand cooled across trading desks. The weakest level in a month for the U.S. dollar, therefore, reflected several linked shifts. First, oil retreated sharply and reduced inflation fears across advanced economies. Second, investors accepted lower odds of a drawn-out blockade near key shipping lanes. Third, central bank pricing moved again, especially around Federal Reserve rate cuts. Fourth, the euro exchange rate and sterling gains confirmed broader selling pressure on the greenback.

For readers, one lesson stands out clearly: currency moves often mirror risk sentiment first. Another lesson also matters, policy expectations regain control once immediate panic starts fading. The weakest level in a month for the U.S. dollar shows relief can rewrite market trends quickly. Traders now watch oil, ceasefire durability, and central bank signals for the next direction.

GCC banking sector revenues

The quarterly rise reached 1.7 percent, showing banks still expanded income despite softer fee generation. Net interest income did most of the work as lending volumes increased across major Gulf markets. Non-interest income slipped after seven rising quarters, trimming part of the gain from core banking activity. At the same time, impairments climbed to their highest level in eighteen quarters regionwide. That shift pushed aggregate net profit down to 15.6 billion dollars from Q3 2025 levels. Broad lending trends gave the quarter its main support, and credit facilities growth stayed widespread.

Listed GCC banks lifted gross loans by 2.7 percent, ending the quarter at 2.47 trillion dollars. Net loans also moved higher, rising 2.5 percent to 2.37 trillion dollars across the region. From my perspective, this pattern shows banks still found healthy demand outside oil-linked segments. Recent project awards and service activity supported borrowing needs in corporate and retail channels. Kamco also linked the trend to resilient non-oil growth across several major economies recently.

Personal and consumer lending remained the strongest driver in the UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, and Oman. Government borrowing also increased in the UAE, Oman, and Bahrain, backing public investment plans.

GCC banking sector revenues and lending strength

Customer deposits then fell 0.6 percent, reaching 2.78 trillion dollars after nineteen straight quarters of gains. This drop, paired with stronger lending, lifted the loan-to-deposit ratio to 85.4 percent. That level stood above the prior quarter reading of 82.8 percent, showing tighter liquidity. Banks still held large funding bases, yet the shift deserves close attention during 2026. Topline growth varied across markets, with Oman, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Saudi lenders posting revenue increases. UAE and Qatari-listed banks reported slight revenue declines, which softened the regional result.

Even so, the record headline confirmed strong earning power from core balance sheet expansion. GCC banking sector revenues also reflected stronger activity in households, government projects, and energy-related segments. Net interest income stayed central because lower yields on credit did not stop loan book growth. Non-interest income moved the other way, reflecting softer fees, trading flows, or related income lines. Energy and utilities lending also showed firm growth, especially in Kuwait and the UAE.
Those patterns matched wider regional spending on infrastructure, power systems, and transition-related projects.

Why profits slipped despite record revenue

Profit pressure came from higher impairments and a second straight rise in operating expenses. Those costs more than offset revenue growth, pulling quarterly earnings back from record levels. Oman stood out as the only market avoiding a quarterly profit decline during Q4 2025. Elsewhere, banks faced broader credit costs as some portfolios required heavier provisioning during the quarter. Construction and manufacturing also weakened in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Bahrain during the period. That pullback may reflect project completion cycles or a more careful industrial expansion phase.

The sector still entered 2026 with scale, lending momentum, and clear support from investment programs. For readers, the main lesson is simple: revenue strength looked solid, yet risk costs rose. Analysts will watch whether GCC banking sector revenues keep rising if deposit competition increases. GCC banking sector revenues should stay linked to lending demand, deposit trends, and credit quality.