Skip to main content

icnlive

WATCH LIVE. THINK BUSINESS.

© 2026 ICN.LIVE

The $105 billion OpenAI deal disclosed in an Nvidia securities filing on Monday commits the chipmaker to standing behind a data center

Trending Tech

Apple App Store security lawsuit

An Apple App Store security lawsuit filed in California accuses the company of negligence after three users lost more than $1.8 million in Bitcoin to a counterfeit wallet app. The complaint landed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Plaintiffs James Ramirez, Christopher Ellis, and Jalen Delgado say they downloaded an app presented as Sparrow Wallet, entered their recovery credentials, and watched their funds move to accounts they did not control.

The mechanism was simple. Sparrow Wallet is desktop software for Windows, macOS, and Linux. Its developer has never shipped an iOS version. The app the plaintiffs installed was a fake crypto wallet app that borrowed the Sparrow name and look, then asked each user for a seed phrase. A seed phrase is the master key to a crypto wallet, a short list of words that grants full control over the funds inside. Once a user types it into an attacker’s app, the coins can be moved out in minutes.

How the Sparrow Wallet scam worked

The losses came in stages. According to the complaint, Delgado installed the app around May 1, 2025, entered his seed phrase, and soon found roughly $120,000 in Bitcoin gone. Ellis installed a similar app months later and lost about $840,000. Ramirez lost close to $875,000. Each transfer sent the coins to wallets held by the scammers.

This seed phrase scam depends on trust in the store, not on breaking any code. No servers were hacked. The plaintiffs argue the App Store crypto scam succeeded because Apple placed the fake listing inside curated cryptocurrency collections, which read as a recommendation to buyers. Some victims reported the theft to Apple and saw little response, according to the filing.

What the Apple App Store security lawsuit claims

The Apple App Store security lawsuit centers on one long-running company argument. Apple reviews apps before they reach users and says that review keeps the platform safe. The complaint quotes Apple’s own marketing about superior security and trustworthiness, then says the fake Bitcoin wallet App Store listing shows the promise fell short. It also points to Craig Raw, the developer of the real Sparrow Wallet, who said in a January 2024 post that a scam copy stayed live weeks after he reported it.

Raw’s account adds a second layer. When he submitted a placeholder app to warn iOS users that no mobile version existed, Apple rejected it and briefly flagged his developer account for dishonest activity. Apple later reversed that flag. Raw has spoken publicly for years about how slowly the company removed copycats.

Apple’s response and the wider stakes

Apple declined to comment on the Apple App Store security lawsuit itself. The company defended its review process to TechCrunch, saying apps that impersonate others break its guidelines and get removed quickly. Apple said no Sparrow Wallet copies are on the store now. It also cited 2025 enforcement figures, including more than 371,000 rejected submissions that copied apps, spammed, or misled users, and 193,000 terminated developer accounts.

The complaint alleges other fake Sparrow apps still sit in the store, a claim Apple disputes. Plaintiffs want a jury trial, their money back, and required warnings about App Store risks. The case tests whether Apple’s safety marketing creates a legal duty the company can be held to. For users, the lesson sits lower down. No legitimate wallet asks for a seed phrase inside an app pulled from a store search.

Saudi digital infrastructure

Saudi digital infrastructure gained a fresh set of benchmarks this week, when the Communications, Space and Technology Commission released the Saudi Internet Report 2025. The fifth edition tracks how people in the Kingdom connect, browse, and use new tools. It reads as a status check on the network and the habits built on top of it.

What the Saudi Digital Infrastructure Report measured?

The report covers usage indicators across the Kingdom. CST is the government body that regulates the sector, so its figures guide operators and users alike. Median mobile internet download speed reached 216 Mbps, up from 203 Mbps a year earlier. That figure places Saudi Arabia among the top five G20 countries on this measure. Median speed is the midpoint, the value where half of connections run faster and half run slower. The 5G median download speed came in higher, at 320 Mbps, with latency of 24 milliseconds. Latency measures the delay before data starts to move, so a lower number means quicker response for calls and games.

Data use and time online

Mobile data consumption tells a similar story. Average mobile data consumption reached 53 GB per person each month, about three times the global average. Streaming, gaming, and video calls drive that volume. The report also found 61.3 percent of users spend seven hours or more online each day. Such heavy use rewards dense coverage and steady capacity.

Time online shapes demand on the network. When most users stay connected for long stretches, operators size their systems for peak load, not idle hours. The strength of Saudi digital infrastructure shows in speeds that hold up under that pressure. Consistent speed under load is the real test of any network.

Saudi Arabia AI adoption climbs

Saudi Arabia AI adoption stands out in the data. The report put the AI tool adoption rate among internet users at 45.2 percent, more than double the 21.5 percent recorded a year earlier. Take-up signals a faster embrace of generative tools, software that produces text, images, or code from a prompt. Women used AI tools more than men, at 52.8 percent against 39.4 percent. Adoption fell with age, from 58.4 percent among those aged 10 to 19 down to 14.8 percent among those 60 to 74.

ChatGPT ranked as the most downloaded AI application, followed by Google Gemini, DeepSeek, and Grok. The Kingdom’s own HUMAIN app placed tenth. Users turned to these tools to search for information, generate ideas, and support study.

Signs of a growing digital economy

Domain name registrations grew 18 percent over the year, a sign of more local sites and services. The report also mapped the fastest-growing applications, common browsing habits, and the most used search engines. These readings reflect wider local content and a larger digital economy.

Saudi digital infrastructure now supports one of the most connected populations in the region. Internet penetration in the Kingdom sat near 99.6 percent, so most residents already hold a connection. CST said the report forms part of its ongoing work to monitor the internet ecosystem and improve digital services. Together, the numbers sketch the state of Saudi digital infrastructure heading into 2026.

Google Fined €890 Million

Brussels fined Google €890 million on Thursday, the first penalty the company has taken under the Digital Markets Act and the sixth EU competition decision against it in under twenty years.

The European Commission split the amount across two separate findings. A €460 million fine covers self-preferencing in Google Search, where the Commission found the company gave its own shopping, hotel, transport and sports results better placement than competing services. The remaining €430 million covers Google Play, where developers were blocked from telling users about cheaper ways to pay outside the store.

Teresa Ribera, the Commission’s competition chief, framed the decision around ranking rather than size. “The best products should succeed because they’re better,” she said, arguing that European consumers have a right to hear from developers about better offers even when the store owner takes no cut.

Google has 60 days to change both practices. It has already said it may go to court.

Google says the fix breaks the product

Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs, said compliance will force the company to remove live search features in Europe, including instant hotel pricing and direct availability for flights and restaurants. He called the outcome “product degradation driven by a small group of self-serving complainants” rather than fair competition, and argued that steering users off Google Play carries security risks.

That argument has not landed. Ribera and EU tech chief Henna Virkkunen both used their briefings to restate that the rules apply regardless of where a company is headquartered.

The bigger story is what happens next

The more consequential detail sits below the fine. The Commission said Google has already proposed and begun testing changes to how it displays its own free services in search, and separately to how it presents shopping ads and sports content. Regulators described this as substantial progress and pointed to a constructive dialogue with the company.

In practice, that means daily non-compliance penalties, which can run to 5% of average daily worldwide turnover, are probably off the table. Apple and Meta, fined in April 2025 in the first DMA actions, did not get the same language.

The Commission also said Google may need to apply Thursday’s reasoning to AI Overviews and AI Mode, its generative summaries in search. Talks on that are continuing. For anyone tracking where this regime is heading, that line matters more than the €890 million. It is the first signal that the DMA’s ranking obligations will follow Google into AI-generated answers, where the distinction between a result and a recommendation gets much harder to police.

Politics in the background

The timing is awkward. The Trump administration has repeatedly cast the EU digital rulebook as a trade barrier aimed at American firms and has raised the prospect of retaliatory tariffs. US lawmakers have added their own pressure. Ribera’s answer, when asked, was that the Commission’s obligation is to enforce its own law.

Total EU antitrust penalties against Google now stand at roughly €10.38 billion, including the €2.95 billion adtech fine issued in September 2025 and the €4.34 billion Android decision from 2018.

Alphabet shares traded about 4% lower before the US open, though most of that reflected investor reaction to the AI spending plans laid out in Wednesday’s earnings, not the fine itself.

For businesses in the Gulf, the direct effect is limited. DMA obligations bite on what European users see, so app developers and travel firms operating here will not see Play Store terms change outside the EU. The precedent is what travels.