• bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
  • ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
  • tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
  • bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
  • solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
  • xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
  • usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
  • staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
  • cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
  • avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
  • bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
    ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
    tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
    bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
    solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
    xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
    usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
    staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
    cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
    avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
  • bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
  • ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
  • tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
  • bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
  • solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
  • xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
  • usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
  • staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
  • cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
  • avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
  • bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
    ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
    tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
    bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
    solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
    xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
    usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
    staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
    cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
    avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
  • bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
  • ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
  • tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
  • bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
  • solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
  • xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
  • usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
  • staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
  • cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
  • avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
  • bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
    ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
    tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
    bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
    solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
    xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
    usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
    staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
    cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
    avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
image-alt-1BTC Dominance: 58.93%
image-alt-2 ETH Dominance: 12.89%
image-alt-3 BTC/ETH Ratio: 26.62%
image-alt-4 Total Market Cap 24h: $2.51T
image-alt-5Volume 24h: $144.96B
image-alt-6 ETH Gas Price: 16 Gwei

MORE FROM SPONSORED

LIVE Web3 News

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Crypto gaming user acquisition cost

Crypto gaming user acquisition cost surges as most expensive in Web3 marketing

Fatima Al-Nouri Fatima Al-Nouri

Crypto gaming user acquisition cost is now the highest among all Web3 marketing segments, recent data reveals.

Gaming and gambling campaigns see the steepest costs when trying to attract users with existing crypto wallets. This metric, known as cost per wallet (CPW), highlights how much advertisers pay to acquire users already equipped for Web3 engagement.

According to a report by Addressable, a Web3 marketing analytics firm, gamingClick here for more Details and gambling campaigns show a median CPW of $8.74. The lower quartile still hovers at $3.40, far surpassing other sectors. Co-founder Asaf Nadler emphasized that CPW is a superior performance indicator because it focuses on users who already hold and use crypto wallets.

Crypto gaming user acquisition cost outpaces DeFi and CeFi marketing

In contrast, decentralized finance (DeFi) and centralized finance (CeFi) campaigns perform much better. With a median CPW of $2.79 and a lower quartile at just $0.10, these sectors are far more cost-effective. The difference suggests that crypto gaming must navigate higher churn rates or user skepticism compared to financial platforms.

Axie Infinity co-founder Jeff “JiHo” Zirlin offered a different perspective, calling high CPW periods an opportunity. He encouraged teams to “create new games,” consolidate their base, and prepare for future growth. High costs may signal a “coiling phase” before an expansion in the market.

ANOTHER MUST-READ ON ICN.LIVE:

Premium markets add pressure to crypto gaming campaign budgets

Nadler’s findings also point to strong regional variances. In 2024, CPW in the United States rose by four times between Q1 and Q3. Western Europe was even more extreme, with a 27-fold CPW increase during the same period. These premium markets become highly expensive during bearish cycles when wallet holder interest drops.

Emerging markets offer some relief. Latin America and Eastern Europe deliver lower CPW under favorable conditions. However, these regions also show extreme volatility, posing a risk to campaign sustainability. Marketers must adapt strategies according to region, market cycle, and campaign timing.

Despite the rising crypto gaming user acquisition cost, the sector remains full of potential. Teams must understand when to push and when to regroup. As market sentiment shifts, strategic flexibility becomes critical. Data-driven insights and regional diversification could help projects reach users more effectively and affordably.

Why is the crypto gaming user acquisition cost higher than other sectors?

Crypto gaming campaigns face higher CPW because they often target users with existing wallets—considered high-value users. These users are more likely to engage, but they are also more difficult and expensive to attract. The sector also suffers from a higher churn rate, where players try a game but leave quickly, making long-term user retention expensive. Additionally, many crypto games are still improving user experience and token economics, which affects adoption and costs.

How does cost per wallet (CPW) differ from traditional ad metrics?

CPW focuses on acquiring users who already have a crypto wallet installed. Unlike impressions or clicks, CPW targets Web3-ready users who are much closer to converting. This metric offers a clearer picture of campaign efficiency in the crypto space. Traditional metrics often include non-relevant traffic, while CPW filters out users without wallets, providing a more accurate ROI assessment for crypto businesses.

What regions are most affordable for crypto gaming campaigns?

Emerging markets like Latin America and Eastern Europe currently offer the lowest CPW. These regions are fertile ground for crypto adoption, often driven by economic volatility or younger, tech-savvy populations. However, they also experience extreme fluctuations in CPW depending on market conditions. Marketers targeting these regions should prepare for rapid changes in performance and costs.

How can crypto gaming projects reduce CPW?

Projects can reduce CPW by improving onboarding flows, focusing on retention, and refining targeting strategies. Offering compelling in-game rewards, using referral programs, and leveraging localized marketing can also improve user acquisition. Timing campaigns with market sentiment is key—during bullish phases, user interest is higher, making acquisition cheaper. Data analysis and adaptive strategies help minimize waste and optimize CPW.

FEATURED

EVENTS

Days
Hr
Min
Sec
 

ICN TALKS EPISODES