Skip to main content

icnlive

WATCH LIVE. THINK BUSINESS.

© 2026 ICN.LIVE

ICN.live

PUBLISHED BY ICN PRESS

  • China’s World Cup absence continues in 2026 even after the tournament grew to 48 teams.
  • A single 2002 appearance remains the only World Cup trip for the men’s national team.
  • Heavy Chinese Super League spending failed to build lasting strength on the pitch.
  • Weak grassroots roots and hard academic pressure keep young players away from the game.

China’s World Cup absence stretches into another summer while North America hosts the biggest football show. You watched the 2026 FIFA World Cup expand from 32 to 48 teams this year. Even with a wider door, the Chinese men’s national team stayed home once again. China reached its first and only World Cup back in 2002 in South Korea and Japan. Since then, the national team has entered every qualifying cycle without earning another ticket. Fans across the country now face the same painful question about football and national pride.

China lost 1-0 to Indonesia in Jakarta during June of last year, ending its run. The defeat left the squad bottom of its Asian group with no route forward. Branko Ivankovic, the team’s head coach, accepted full blame for the failed campaign right afterward. His team finished with six points from nine matches and a weak goal difference. Japan and Iran booked their places early on while China fell far behind them. Nine Asian teams reached the expanded finals this time, including newcomers Jordan and Uzbekistan. China’s huge population passes 1.4 billion people, yet the men’s side keeps falling short.

A dream born right at the top

Xi Jinping placed football near the center of a national ambition more than a decade ago. Before he became president, he named three public wishes for the sport he loved. He wanted the country to qualify, then host, and one day win the tournament. The Xi Jinping football plan took shape in April 2016 with bold national targets. Officials promised 70,000 new pitches and 30 million schoolchildren playing football across China by 2020. A decade later, the real results look quite modest against those large early promises. The men’s national team sat 82nd in the world back in 2016 across global rankings. Today it sits near 91st place out of 211 national teams tracked by FIFA.

China’s World Cup absence and the money years

China’s World Cup absence looks stranger once you study the spending during the boom years. The Chinese Super League drew global stars with enormous wages between 2015 and 2017. Clubs spent about 1.12 billion dollars on transfers across those three heavy-spending seasons. Big names like Oscar, Hulk, Paulinho, and Carlos Tevez traded Europe for Chinese football. Property developers funded most of this spending boom for reasons far beyond sport itself. By 2018, every single top-flight club owner also held interests in the property market. Dr. Tobias Ross studied this scene closely for a new book on the subject.

He interviewed 200 people inside Chinese football to understand the real motives at work. “It was never about football,” Ross told CNN Sports about the owners’ true aims. Owners chased closer ties with local party officials to reach land and bank loans. Officials, in turn, gained real prestige and a stronger case for career promotion at home. The whole model rarely made money, and Ross plainly called it a loss-making business. Guangzhou Evergrande won eight league titles yet still lost huge sums almost every year. Bloomberg reported yearly losses between 155 and 310 million dollars for the club in 2021.

Fans filled stadiums for a while, drawn by famous names and loud matchday shows. None of the current national team players compete for top clubs outside China today. European leagues still shape the best talent, and Chinese players lack such exposure abroad.

When the money and the interest faded

The wild spending spree never rested on a base built for the long term. Cash often dried up soon once developers secured their land or finished their key projects. Local officials chased short wins during limited terms rather than slow, patient team building. A slowing economy and falling birth rate then pushed football down the priority list. Ross notes football no longer sits inside the country’s important central five-year plan today. Local governments also lack spare cash right after the pandemic drained their tight budgets. Priorities shifted toward technology and trade as rivalry with the United States grew sharper.

Corruption also drained public trust across Chinese football here over many difficult recent years. Authorities handed lifetime bans to 73 players and officials over match-fixing earlier this year. Former national coach Li Tie now serves a long prison sentence for taking bribes. Weak oversight let public money slip into the wrong private hands again and again. Investigations reached coaches, referees, and top league bosses across several painful recent seasons here. Trust takes many years to rebuild once fans watch scandal after scandal unfold openly. Several naturalized players left the squad, and this move widened the talent gap further.

A Chinese football player

No culture to fill the pitches

China’s World Cup absence also traces back to weak roots at the community level. Beijing built many pitches, yet the country lacks a deep football tradition to fill them. Rowan Simons moved to China during the 1980s and later studied the language there. He soon became a well-known commentator and searched for a local club to join. “There were no football clubs then,” Simons told CNN Sports about his early years. Everything ran through the government, and this reality surprised him deeply at the time. In Britain, amateur clubs run on volunteers who mow pitches and drive team buses. China’s grassroots football stays fairly thin without those social clubs and shared community habits. Simons argues real progress needs the whole sport built from the base upward first. China lacks this base, so new pitches sit empty without steady weekend teams around. Volunteers keep local British football alive through shared duties passed down across many families.

The numbers behind the shortfall

China now counts around 980,000 registered players and roughly 40,000 amateur teams in total. England holds a population of around 4.2 percent of the Chinese total, yet fields more. This smaller nation still lists more registered players and three times as many teams. An official report last December ranked football outside the country’s six most popular sports. Badminton and cycling both draw more everyday players than the national football game does. China opened thousands of new school pitches, yet trained coaches stayed in short supply. Good coaching turns raw players into real teams, and China trails on this front.

Simons points to a sharp drop-off he simply calls the cliff in youth football. Children often play in primary school before heavy pressure pulls them off the pitch. The gaokao college exam looms large, and many parents drop sport for study time. State media even calls it the hardest test in the world for good reason. His own club sees heavy dropout among players once they turn 12 years old.

A system built for medals

Simon Chadwick teaches sport at Emlyon Business School and sees an even deeper problem. “Football rewards individual flair,” Chadwick told CNN Sports about stars like Messi and Ronaldo. He argues Chinese society rarely rewards the loose personal creativity strong football clearly demands. Family life, school, and work often follow rather tight and highly shared daily routines. Such a rigid structure leaves little room for the messy street play great talents need. Talented children need free play, and rigid schedules squeeze out such daily freedom fast. China finished a strong second in the medal table at the 2024 Paris Olympics. Chadwick says the Chinese sports system aims mostly toward clear, individual Olympic medal events. Winning a sprint race differs sharply from building a squad for a month-long tournament.

China’s World Cup absence and the road ahead

China’s World Cup absence hangs over every plan for the next generation of players. The China 2002 World Cup run still stands as the peak for the men’s team. Serbian coach Bora Milutinovic guided the side through Asian qualifying without a loss then. The squad lost all three group games in 2002 and scored no goals at all. Sun Jihai played in the 2002 tournament and later joined Manchester City in England. He also became the first East Asian player to score in the Premier League. Today he hopes to coach young players and repair Chinese football from the inside. “Youth coaching offers the fastest path to fix it,” Sun said in one interview.

Foreign coaches came and went, yet none of them fixed the shallow talent pool. From my reading of the evidence, no quick fix will change these deep habits soon. Money alone never built the culture your favorite football nations slowly grew over generations. You can now see why patience matters more than any single wave of hard spending. China owns wealth, ambition, and huge crowds, yet the grassroots base still needs work. Patience, better schools, and real local clubs offer the only honest path back up. Chinese brands still appear across the 2026 FIFA World Cup through large sponsorship deals. So the country shapes the tournament off the pitch while missing the pitch itself. The next qualifying cycle starts fairly soon, and young players carry the country’s hopes. Real change now waits in classrooms, community clubs, and a football culture built over time.

TAGS

EXPLORE MORE ON:

how to build discipline

How founders build discipline depends on system design, not personal willpower. Many people frame discipline as a fixed trait. They believe a person either has it or does not. The evidence points elsewhere. Discipline usually reflects the environment around a choice. It rarely reflects the character of the person making it. For a founder, that gap matters. A company runs on thousands of small choices made under pressure. The design of a day, a calendar, and a workspace shapes what a founder does next. Small structural choices carry more weight than raw effort.

How Founders Build Discipline Without Relying On Motivation

Willpower is a limited resource. It drains as the day goes on. Strong morning plans often fall apart by evening. A founder who runs on motivation loses focus once fatigue sets in. Structure works another way. A system holds a decision in place no matter the mood or the hour. This idea sits at the core of disciplined entrepreneurship. A repeatable process replaces the daily argument with oneself. The founders who last are not more motivated than their peers. They have removed the moments where motivation gets tested. Motivation feels reliable in the moment. It is not. A plan written on a calm morning survives a hard afternoon far better than a promise made under stress.

Cutting The Decision Fatigue Founders Face Every Day

Decision fatigue means the drop in judgment after many choices. The decision fatigue founders face builds fast. Each open question pulls attention from the next. One fix is to decide ahead of time. A founder maps annual goals once. Then a weekly review sets the priorities. This turns hundreds of daily debates into plain execution. Strong founder productivity habits often come down to this one move. Deciding early guards the energy a leader needs for real work. The daily habits of successful founders show fewer open choices, not more effort.

Replace Weak Habits, Do Not Ban Them

Business discipline also depends on how a founder treats weak habits. Force rarely works for long. A better method swaps the weak habit for a workable one. Then the founder improves that swap over time. Say a leader checks metrics every hour under stress. One scheduled review can take the place of that pattern. Small, staged trades outlast sudden bans. The goal is not instant perfection. It is steady movement toward a better default. Each swap should feel easy to repeat. If it feels hard to sustain, it will not hold. Founders build lasting change through small wins, not through pressure.

The Case For Boring Systems

Good systems rarely feel thrilling. That is the point. A routine full of novelty is not truly a routine. Some founders chase new tools, methods, and frameworks. They mistake motion for progress. Plain, steady execution compounds in a way flashier work cannot. This is where how founders build discipline shows from the outside. The work looks dull and repetitive. Under it sits a set of choices made once and followed without argument. Over months and years, that structure divides the founders who ship from the ones who stall. In the end, how founders build discipline is a question of design, repeated until it holds.

Oura IPO Arrives

The Oura IPO gives you a clear read on how fast the smart ring market has changed. Oura filed to go public on September 3. The Finnish company built its name on sleep and health tracking, and the numbers show the payoff. Revenue nearly doubled to $1.21 billion for the nine months ending June 30. Oura sold 3.6 million rings over the past year. It now counts around 5 million paid members. The filing follows the launch of the Oura Ring 5, the slimmest and lightest model the company has made.

Early estimates put the offering near $2.5 billion, with a planned listing on Nasdaq. That scale tells you something simple. A product once seen as niche now carries the weight of a public company. The Oura IPO puts that shift in plain numbers.

Why the Oura IPO matters to buyers

Here is what affects you. Competition tends to lower prices and speed up feature releases. More rivals usually means faster upgrades and better value for the ring on your hand. Oura led the smart ring market for years, but rivals are arriving from every direction, each with its own angle. French company Circular says its next ring will let you tap to pay. Chinese company RingConn released a ring this year with haptic vibrations, small buzzes you feel on your finger. That shift changes what a ring can do.

The money behind the challengers

Indian company Ultrahuman raised $70 million this week, with backing from Qualcomm’s venture arm. Ultrahuman wants to build a ring running software on the device itself. Over time, the company says that could power AI features and even games. As a smart ring maker, Ultrahuman is aiming well past sleep scores. Backing from a chip giant like Qualcomm shows the goal is serious.

The Ultrahuman Ring Pro shows the plan in hardware. Priced at $479, it starts shipping in the US in mid-September. It carries a redesigned heart-rate sensor built to read cleaner signals while you sleep. A new dual-core processor, a chip with two cores, handles more accurate data and more work on the device.

The Ring Pro also comes out of a legal fight. Ultrahuman’s US business stalled in October 2025 after the US International Trade Commission ruled for Oura in a patent dispute. The ruling blocked the company from importing new ring inventory. So Ultrahuman rebuilt the Ring Pro with a new form factor to work around Oura’s patent.

Payments, screens, and the race ahead

Circular plans its Ring 3 series for early next year, with a Pro model and a Slim option. Both rings include an NFC chip, the same tap-to-pay tech in your phone, for contactless payments. They also add on-finger vibrations for silent alarms, reminders, and health alerts.

The direction is easy to see. Smart rings were once sold on the idea of stepping away from a screen while keeping tabs on your health. For years, a ring felt lighter than a smartwatch, easy to forget on your finger. That quiet appeal could fade if rings keep adding screens and buttons. Now the race is about how many phone-like features fit inside a two-gram titanium band. Some rings already carry screens, like the Pebble Halo, sold in India for now. Others promise touchpads, like the Dreame Ring. The Oura IPO lands in the middle of this rush.

What Oura Ring alternatives offer now

Shopping for Oura Ring alternatives now means more real choice. Buyers hunting for the best smart rings in 2026 can weigh payments, vibrations, and on-device software against Oura’s tracking. The Oura IPO does not settle the contest. It raises the stakes for every smart ring maker trying to lead. For you, more competition tends to mean more features and better prices ahead.

OpenAI GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra is OpenAI’s new frontier model, and its arrival brings two questions to the center of the AI market: what these systems can do, and what they cost to run. OpenAI describes Astra as its most capable and most aligned model so far. Access opened first to a limited set of organizations, then widened to paid users across ChatGPT Plus, Pro, Business, and Enterprise. The GPT-6 Astra release date fell in early September, with a limited preview ahead of broader access.

Developers can reach the model through the OpenAI API, Microsoft Azure, and Amazon Bedrock. The company built Astra for long, multi-step work rather than short chat. That design shows in the strongest gains, which sit in GPT-6 Astra computer use. OpenAI says the model can fill out online forms, update customer records, organize a calendar, run research, and draft summaries inside a user’s email or document editor. The aim is a system that finishes tasks, not one that only answers questions.

Business Intelligence & News

  • OpenAI’s advertising revenue reached a $1 billion annualized run rate, the company said.
  • The ad business is about 200 days old and now runs in more than 40 countries.
  • Self-service buying is expanding to India, Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa.
  • The push comes as OpenAI prepares to go public and defends an $852 billion valuation.

What the GPT-6 Astra benchmarks show

The GPT-6 Astra benchmarks published by the company are aggressive. OpenAI says the model saturates FrontierMath Tier 4 at close to 98 percent, reaches 99.9 percent on ARC-AGI-3, and scores 100 percent on ExploitBench. Both the math and reasoning tests were designed to stay ahead of AI systems, so results this high point to a real step up. One caveat matters here. The ARC-AGI-3 score used a general-purpose setup that preserved the model’s reasoning and managed long context, so it is not a clean match with every earlier figure.

Independent testing gives a more measured read. Artificial Analysis found Astra roughly level with its predecessor on overall intelligence, and behind Claude Fable 5.1 on general reasoning, while gaining on coding at lower cost.

On computer-use speed, OpenAI reports a higher score on the OSWorld 2.0 test in about 47 percent less time per task than the prior model, GPT-5.6 Sol. For firms weighing automation of desk work, time per task can weigh as much as raw accuracy.

Cost and cybersecurity set the real test

GPT-6 Astra pricing is where the tradeoff shows most clearly. Standard rates run at 10 dollars per million input tokens and 50 dollars per million output tokens, about 2.5 times the prior flagship’s 4 and 20 dollar rates. OpenAI notes that Astra often uses fewer tokens for similar work, which can offset part of the higher rate. Whether that holds depends on the task. The number worth tracking is cost per finished result, not the headline token price.

On safety, Astra is the first OpenAI model to reach the Critical level for cybersecurity under the company’s internal framework. OpenAI says the model can find unknown security flaws and build ways to exploit them across well-defended systems without a person guiding each step. To limit misuse, the company restricts the most advanced exploit abilities and adds production safeguards. It also flagged a weakness in how well its monitors can read the model’s reasoning under pressure, and named that as open work.

The wider shift is about where value moves. As frontier models take on full tasks rather than single answers, the market question moves from capability alone to capability set against cost and risk. The OpenAI GPT-6 Astra release, arriving alongside strong models from rival labs, brings that calculation into the open for enterprise buyers.

Share this post

on your favourite social platforms

or copy the link