Skip to main content

icnlive

WATCH LIVE. THINK BUSINESS.

© 2026 ICN.LIVE

ICN.live

PUBLISHED BY ICN PRESS

  • OpenAI’s advertising revenue reached a $1 billion annualized run rate, the company said.
  • The ad business is about 200 days old and now runs in more than 40 countries.
  • Self-service buying is expanding to India, Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa.
  • The push comes as OpenAI prepares to go public and defends an $852 billion valuation.

OpenAI’s advertising revenue has reached a $1 billion annualized revenue run rate, the company said this week. That figure takes the money coming in now and stretches it across a full year, so it shows the pace of income rather than cash already banked. The number stands out because the ad business is only about 200 days old. For a product that young, the speed says something about how quickly advertisers are testing the platform.

What the milestone means

OpenAI calls the result proof of a “diversified business model,” meaning income from more than one source. The company already earns from enterprise deals, consumer subscriptions, and usage-based programming interfaces, the tools that let outside software connect to its systems. Advertising now sits beside those streams. For context, the ad product passed $100 million on the same measure within weeks of its launch, so the climb has been fast. ChatGPT ads appear for people on the free tier and the lower-cost Go plan, and that free tier makes up most of the roughly 1 billion weekly users. Such reach gives the business room to grow. OpenAI shared the update as it widens the product into new regions.

OpenAI’s advertising revenue and the road to an IPO

Timing here is not random. OpenAI is preparing for a public listing, and ahead of the OpenAI IPO, the company faces pressure to defend a high price. The $852 billion OpenAI valuation is the figure investors have placed on the business, and a second or third income stream makes it easier to justify. This listing could rank among the biggest tech debuts in years, which raises the bar for the numbers OpenAI shows. OpenAI’s advertising revenue gives the company a growth story beyond subscriptions, which is what public investors tend to reward.

How ChatGPT ads work

OpenAI started testing ads inside ChatGPT in the United States in February. The move was expected and also drew criticism. Digital advertising has long paid the bills for Google and Meta, so the direction felt familiar, yet a chatbot carrying ads was new. The ads run beneath answers rather than inside them, and each carries a clear sponsored label. OpenAI says the ads do not change ChatGPT’s replies, and advertisers cannot see private conversations. The step also marked a change of heart at the top. Sam Altman, the company’s chief executive, had once called advertising a last resort and worried that users might trust a chatbot less if it sold products. The company now says it does not show ads to people it believes are under 18. OpenAI’s advertising revenue rests on that trust, since a user who doubts the answers has little reason to stay.

Not everyone welcomed the shift. Anthropic, OpenAI’s main competitor, mocked the ad push and built its first Super Bowl campaign around one pitch: a chatbot without ads. Meanwhile, the wider industry is moving the same way. Google is folding ads into its AI answers, and other large platforms are testing similar ideas. That competition raises the stakes, because OpenAI is chasing budgets Google and Meta already control. How much of that money shifts to chatbots is far from settled.

Where OpenAI’s advertising revenue goes next

ChatGPT ads run in more than 40 countries today. OpenAI is widening self-service buying through a system called ChatGPT Ads Manager, which lets businesses run their own campaigns without a sales rep, across India, Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa. The company says its coming expansion will reach more markets and add new ad formats, buying options, and better measurement. OpenAI also plans to test more native ways for businesses to reach people inside ChatGPT. Whether OpenAI’s advertising revenue can climb from a $1 billion run rate toward the much larger targets the company has floated will depend on how many advertisers stay once the novelty fades.

TAGS

EXPLORE MORE ON:

Why AI won't end the world

Why AI won’t end the world is a question Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang answered with a single number on Sept. 18: zero. In a CBS News interview, he said: “2030 is not going to be the end of the world. There is 0% chance that’s going to be the end of the world.” Huang called recent warnings from researchers inside the industry “doomsday narratives.” He said they lack any scientific basis and called scaring the public “unnecessary” and “irresponsible.”

The debate over why AI won’t end the world reached Huang through a question about Jacob Coxon, a former Anthropic researcher. Coxon posted on X on Sept. 8 that AI could destroy humanity by the end of the decade.

Four people who pay for AI chatbots filed an AI slowdown lawsuit in federal court in San Francisco the same day. It names Anthropic, OpenAI, Google and Elon Musk’s SpaceX AI, and accuses them of an unlawful agreement to develop AI more slowly.

Inside the AI antitrust lawsuit

The case rests on Section 1 of the Sherman Act, the US law against agreements between competitors to restrain trade. Under it, a pact among rivals can be illegal even when each firm could lawfully take the same step alone. The four plaintiffs subscribe to ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, or Gemini. They want to represent all other paying US customers and argue a joint slowdown cuts the value of those subscriptions.

The complaint centers on an essay Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published on Sept. 12. In it, Amodei asked the industry to ease the pace of AI development together, an approach he called pacing the frontier. He gave two reasons for changing his position. AI models now help build their successors, and in July a group of OpenAI test agents got into an outside company’s systems without human instruction.

Within hours, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman posted on X that he agreed with Amodei. The complaint quotes Google DeepMind co-founder and chair Demis Hassabis calling the plan “the right path forward.” Musk, whose company xAI makes the Grok chatbot, replied with a three-word post: “Dario is right.”

The complaint puts it this way: “The antitrust laws do not permit competitors to decide among themselves that competition is too dangerous.”

Business Intelligence & News

  • Meta One in the UAE brings paid tiers from Dh5.99 to Dh1,199 a month across WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook, and Meta AI.
  • Core versions of all four apps stay free, with subscriptions adding features and heavier AI usage on top.
  • Entry plans start at Dh5.99 for WhatsApp Plus, while creator and business bundles climb into the hundreds.
  • Meta reports more than 15 million subscriptions and trials worldwide, with Edits and AI glasses features still to come.

What the plaintiffs accept, and what they reject

The filing accepts that companies may slow their own work, and may ask Congress or federal regulators for AI regulation, including an exemption from antitrust law. Its objection is to a private pact among rivals, which the complaint calls a “shortcut” that would “substitute collective restraint for individual accountability.”

Lead attorney Nick Rowley described AI extinction risk in terms close to the warnings Huang dismissed. AI “will quickly spin out of human control and could kill us all,” he said, if “private self-serving agreements” among big tech companies set the safety rules.

The filing also cites a July statement signed by 1,386 people at frontier AI labs. Amodei, OpenAI chief scientist Jakub Pachocki and Google DeepMind co-founder Shane Legg were among them.

Amodei saw the legal exposure coming. His essay asks the US government to enable industry safety talks and issue “a narrow waiver for certain kinds of safety conversations.” The four companies had not responded to the Associated Press by Saturday.

Why AI won’t end the world, in Huang’s telling

Huang’s case for why AI won’t end the world rests on two points. The first is that the extinction forecasts have no science behind them. His second is incentives. CBS asked why Americans should trust him on AI safety, and he replied that Nvidia’s success depends on safe deployment. He also argued current cybersecurity and liability laws already cover an event like the July breach. Those pushing the warnings, he said, want relief from those laws rather than new rules.

Nvidia has a financial stake in the debate. The July breach hit Hugging Face, an AI model-hosting platform. About 700 OpenAI test agents with loosened safety limits got into its production systems unprompted. Nvidia struck a deal to acquire the platform six weeks after the incident. The chipmaker announced the purchase on Sept. 3. It put the total at about $12.9 billion, including as much as $1 billion in equity to retain staff. Nothing on the public record ties the deal to Huang’s stance on AI safety. The company has not commented on the timing.

On the question of why AI won’t end the world, Huang’s answer is a number: zero. Anthropic alignment researcher Evan Hubinger has put the odds of AI wiping out humanity within a decade above 10 percent. That is his personal estimate, not a consensus figure. A federal judge will not settle that disagreement. The AI antitrust lawsuit asks a narrower question: whether the public endorsements and the July statement add up to an agreement the Sherman Act forbids.

Share this post

on your favourite social platforms

or copy the link