• bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
  • ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
  • tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
  • bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
  • solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
  • xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
  • usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
  • staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
  • cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
  • avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
  • bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
    ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
    tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
    bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
    solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
    xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
    usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
    staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
    cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
    avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
image-alt-1BTC Dominance: 58.93%
image-alt-2 ETH Dominance: 12.89%
image-alt-3 BTC/ETH Ratio: 26.62%
image-alt-4 Total Market Cap 24h: $2.51T
image-alt-5Volume 24h: $144.96B
image-alt-6 ETH Gas Price: 5.1 Gwei
 

MORE FROM SPONSORED

LIVE Web3 News

 

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Kraken suspends Monero deposits

Kraken suspends Monero deposits after 51% attack concerns and rising hash rate fears

Salma Al-Tamimi

Kraken suspends Monero deposits due to rising fears of a 51% attack, following an alarming shift in Monero’s hash rate.

Kraken crypto exchange detected that a single mining pool had gained control of more than half of the Monero network’s hash rate, triggering an immediate response. Kraken has suspended Monero deposits but confirmed that trading and withdrawals remain unaffected.

The pool in question, Qubic, is linked to IOTA co-founder Sergey Ivancheglo. His public admission of controlling 51% of the hash rate raised questions about the intent behind this maneuver. From my standpoint, the claim itself presents a direct challenge to Monero’s decentralization. Controlling over half of a network’s computing power allows for potential block reorganizations or double-spending, which directly undermines network trust.

Kraken crypto exchange stated that deposits will only resume once the network is deemed secure. Meanwhile, Monero dropped by around 6% and was trading at $257, according to TradingView.

here


Security at Risk as Hash Rate Centralizes

Ivancheglo argued that his actions aimed to “stress test” the network and reveal vulnerabilities. He insists the move will help the community respond to similar threats in the future. I would argue that this justification feels more like a retroactive rationalization than a real concern for the ecosystem.

From where I stand, intentionally reaching a 51% hash rate contradicts Monero’s core principles of privacy and decentralization. The risks here are real: censorship of transactions, halting confirmations, and possible double-spending events could destroy market confidence.

Still, some in the community view Ivancheglo’s move as a wake-up call. One user on Reddit commented, “At least now we know where our weak points are.” That said, I don’t agree with the method. The consequences of such experiments are too costly in a market already battling volatility.


ANOTHER MUST-READ ON ICN.LIVE: 

1M ETH holdings mark crossed by BitMine with $5B Ethereum treasury strategy


Kraken has suspended Monero due to real structural threats

This incident should be a turning point. Any blockchain that claims to be secure must ensure decentralization across miners. The Kraken crypto exchange acted responsibly by halting deposits. As far as I’m concerned, the move sends a clear message: security matters more than convenience.

Key stakeholders now need to evaluate the incentives for mining Monero. A single actor, regardless of intent, must never have majority control of the hash rate. Moving forward, the community will need to implement safeguards against similar takeovers.

SHARE

Why did Kraken suspend Monero deposits?

Kraken suspended Monero deposits because one mining pool, Qubic, reportedly gained control of over 50% of the network’s hash rate. This scenario, known as a 51% attack, poses significant security risks. It can allow the controller to censor transactions, reorganize blocks, or perform double-spending. Kraken’s move aims to protect its users and the network while evaluating the situation. Trading and withdrawals remain active, but deposits will only resume once security is assured.

What is a 51% attack and why is it dangerous?

A 51% attack occurs when a single entity controls the majority of a blockchain network’s computing power. In Monero’s case, this means the attacker could reject valid transactions, reverse completed ones, or block new ones entirely. This undermines the very foundation of trust in the network. It threatens decentralization and allows manipulation that’s typically impossible under normal conditions. It’s a worst-case scenario for any Proof-of-Work chain.

Who is Sergey Ivancheglo and what is Qubic?

Sergey Ivancheglo is a co-founder of IOTA and the leader of Qubic, the mining pool involved in this event. He claimed responsibility for gaining 51% of Monero’s hash rate, stating it was to test the network’s vulnerabilities. While some see it as a warning exercise, others criticize the move for putting the network at risk. Qubic’s role has ignited a broader debate about ethical mining behavior and responsible leadership in crypto.

How has Monero’s price reacted to the news?

Monero (XMR) has dropped around 6% in response to the reported hash rate takeover. The price sat at approximately $257 at the time of the report. While trading remains active, investor confidence has taken a hit. Security concerns, especially around decentralization, tend to affect privacy coins more severely. The market will be watching closely to see how the Monero community responds and whether Kraken resumes deposits anytime soon.

FEATURED

EVENTS

Days
Hr
Min
Sec
 

ICN TALKS EPISODES