• bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
  • ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
  • tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
  • bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
  • solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
  • xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
  • usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
  • staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
  • cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
  • avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
  • bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
    ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
    tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
    bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
    solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
    xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
    usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
    staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
    cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
    avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
  • bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
  • ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
  • tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
  • bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
  • solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
  • xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
  • usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
  • staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
  • cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
  • avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
  • bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
    ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
    tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
    bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
    solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
    xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
    usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
    staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
    cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
    avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
  • bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
  • ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
  • tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
  • bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
  • solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
  • xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
  • usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
  • staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
  • cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
  • avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
  • bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
    ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
    tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
    bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
    solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
    xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
    usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
    staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
    cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
    avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
image-alt-1BTC Dominance: 58.93%
image-alt-2 ETH Dominance: 12.89%
image-alt-3 BTC/ETH Ratio: 26.62%
image-alt-4 Total Market Cap 24h: $2.51T
image-alt-5Volume 24h: $144.96B
image-alt-6 ETH Gas Price: 0.76 Gwei

MORE FROM SPONSORED

LIVE Web3 News

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Meta Llama 4 AI capabilities

Meta Llama 4 AI capabilities set new benchmark in the generative race

Mariam Al-Yazidi Mariam Al-Yazidi

Meta Llama 4 AI capabilities are reshaping the competitive landscape of artificial intelligence in 2025.

With the debut of Llama 4 Scout and Llama 4 Maverick, Meta is raising the bar for open-source AI. Both models use a sophisticated Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture, which allows them to function efficiently and intelligently. MoE structures divide problem-solving into parts, where smaller expert models each tackle a specific task. This structure enhances precision and conserves computing power.

Llama 4 Scout has 17 billion active parameters and utilizes 16 experts. It can operate on a single NVIDIA H100 GPU. Llama 4 Maverick, with 128 experts, is more powerful but also more demanding in hardware requirements. Both models are optimized for multimodality, meaning they can process text, image, audio, and video simultaneously.

Meta asserts that these AI models outperform competitors like Mistral 3.1, Gemini 2.0, and even Google’s Gemma 3.

Llama 4 Maverick rivals DeepSeek at lower cost

One of the most talked-about comparisons is Meta’s Llama 4 Maverick versus DeepSeek v3.

Despite having fewer active parameters, Llama 4 Maverick delivers results on par with DeepSeek in reasoning and coding. DeepSeek made headlines earlier this year after it launched DeepSeek R1, an AI model trained for just $6 million. That model shocked the AIClick here for more Details world, especially given that OpenAI reportedly spent $100 million to train GPT-4.

MetaClick here for more Details’s efficiency through its MoE framework echoes this disruptive trend. With Llama 4, it is clear that better architecture can match or even beat brute-force training costs. This shift also makes open-source development more competitive against closed models from OpenAI or Anthropic.

Meta Llama 4 AI capabilities aren’t just lab results—they’re integrated into real-world applications.

Llama 4 is now embedded in Instagram, WhatsApp, and other Meta platforms, allowing users to interact with advanced AI directly. It creates a seamless user experience by understanding images, responding in natural language, and handling tasks across media types.

Moreover, Llama 4 demonstrates strong performance in politically sensitive prompts. According to Meta’s evaluations, its lean is comparable to Elon Musk’s Grok AIClick here for more Details. Meta has also announced Llama 4 Behemoth, a future model still under training, which could further enhance AI interactions in real-time environments.

This makes Meta a central player in the growing field of consumer-facing AI systems.

Llama 4 models lead the open-source AI movement

Meta Llama 4’s AI capabilities reflect a major shift toward accessible, high-performance open-source AI.

By releasing Llama 4 models to the public, Meta is challenging the dominance of closed ecosystems. Developers, startups, and even researchers now have access to advanced AI tools previously reserved for tech giants. Meta’s approach encourages transparency, innovation, and decentralization in AI development.

Llama 4’s success is not just about benchmarks—it’s about usability, flexibility, and strategic deployment across platforms. As more companies adopt these models, Meta strengthens its role as a leader in shaping AI’s future.

ANOTHER MUST-READ ON ICN.LIVE

 

What are Meta Llama 4 AI capabilities?

Meta Llama 4 models use multimodal technology and MoE architecture to handle tasks across text, image, audio, and video. The Scout model runs efficiently on a single GPU, while Maverick offers greater power with more experts. Their open-source nature, combined with superior performance on major benchmarks, makes them a standout in the AI field. They integrate directly into Meta platforms like WhatsApp and Instagram for real-world interaction.

How does Llama 4 compare to DeepSeek’s AI?

Llama 4 Maverick delivers results comparable to DeepSeek v3 in reasoning and coding, despite fewer active parameters. While DeepSeek stunned the world with its cost-effective training model, Meta’s MoE architecture achieves similar efficiency through design. This makes Llama 4 a strong alternative for those seeking powerful, scalable AI tools in open-source form.

Why is the Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture important in Llama 4?

MoE architecture allows Llama 4 to activate only the necessary expert models for a given task, saving computational power and improving accuracy. This modular design enhances performance without increasing cost dramatically. It also enables Meta to scale AI power more efficiently than monolithic models, aligning with the trend toward smarter, lighter systems.

Is Meta’s Llama 4 available for public use?

Yes. Both Scout and Maverick versions of Llama 4 are available for developers and users. They can be downloaded for research or integrated into applications. Meta has also implemented them in apps like WhatsApp and Instagram. This makes Llama 4 one of the most accessible and functional AI models on the market today.

FEATURED

EVENTS

Days
Hr
Min
Sec
 

ICN TALKS EPISODES