• bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
  • ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
  • tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
  • bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
  • solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
  • xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
  • usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
  • staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
  • cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
  • avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
  • bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
    ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
    tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
    bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
    solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
    xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
    usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
    staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
    cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
    avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
image-alt-1BTC Dominance: 58.93%
image-alt-2 ETH Dominance: 12.89%
image-alt-3 BTC/ETH Ratio: 26.62%
image-alt-4 Total Market Cap 24h: $2.51T
image-alt-5Volume 24h: $144.96B
image-alt-6 ETH Gas Price: 5.1 Gwei
 

MORE FROM SPONSORED

LIVE Web3 News

 

ARTICLE INFORMATION

South Korea crypto ETF policy

South Korea’s crypto ETF policy creates new uncertainty for institutional investors

Tariq Al-Mansouri

South Korea’s crypto ETF policy is drawing criticism after the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) issued fresh warnings to asset managers.

According to a report from The Korea Herald, the FSS verbally instructed local firms to cut their exposure to crypto-related companies like Coinbase and Michael Saylor’s Strategy. This instruction aims to reinforce the Financial Services Commission’s (FSC) administrative guidance from 2017. That policy prohibits regulated financial institutions from investing in digital asset equities.

This unexpected move arrives despite recent discussions around easing crypto trading rules in South Korea. While retail investors can freely access U.S.-listed crypto ETFs, local institutional players are now being warned to pull back. The inconsistency has triggered complaints from financial firms, who feel the rule creates an unfair environment.

The warning reportedly came in verbal form earlier this month and has already affected internal portfolio strategies at multiple firms.

ANOTHER MUST-READ ON ICN.LIVE:

PancakeSwap Infinity on Base: What It Means for DeFi’s Multichain Future

Uneven playing field stirs industry backlash

Many local asset managers say this ruling restricts competitiveness. Retail investors continue to buy crypto-focused U.S. ETFs, yet institutions must follow outdated guidelines. The FSS has stated that these rules will remain in place until new regulations are officially enacted.

The FSS acts as the executive arm of the Financial Services Commission. While the FSC handles top-level regulatory strategy, the FSS focuses on daily oversight. Their recent actions highlight the gap between evolving market conditions and regulatory enforcement.

Despite the regulatory shifts in the U.S. and a changing landscape in South Korea, the current framework remains. The FSS emphasized that institutions must respect the 2017 rule until further notice. This includes avoiding any direct investment exposure to firms like Coinbase and Strategy, even via ETFs.

South Korea crypto ETF policy under industry scrutiny

South Korea’s crypto ETF policy seems to be entering a pivotal moment. While global markets move toward embracing digital assets, local institutions face mounting restrictions. The directive has sparked urgent calls for updated regulations aligned with today’s financial landscape.

Industry analysts say the move could stifle South Korea’s ability to innovate in the digital asset space. With crypto becoming mainstream, keeping institutional players on the sidelines may hurt the market’s long-term development.

As it stands, financial firms are stuck following rules created before the ETF boom and widespread crypto adoption. Unless the FSC updates its guidelines, South Korea risks falling behind.

SHARE

Why is South Korea restricting crypto ETF exposure for institutions?

South Korea’s Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) recently told local asset managers to reduce their exposure to U.S.-listed crypto-related companies like Coinbase and Strategy. This move reinforces a 2017 administrative guideline from the Financial Services Commission (FSC), which bans regulated financial institutions from investing in virtual asset equities. Although the global regulatory environment is evolving, the FSS insists that firms must stick to the current rules until new guidelines are formally introduced. This decision has caused pushback from domestic institutions who believe the policy creates an unfair imbalance with retail investors.

What does the 2017 FSC guideline actually prohibit?

The 2017 administrative guideline by South Korea’s Financial Services Commission prohibits financial institutions from buying, holding, or making equity investments in digital assets or virtual asset-related companies. This includes crypto exchanges, platforms, and even stocks like Coinbase or firms such as Strategy (MSTR). While this policy was originally aimed at minimizing risk in a relatively immature crypto market, its enforcement in 2025 is seen as outdated by many industry insiders. Until new regulations are passed, this guideline remains legally binding for institutional entities.

How are South Korean financial firms responding to the FSS directive?

Many asset management firms are frustrated by the sudden re-enforcement of this old policy. They argue it limits their ability to compete and adapt to global trends in crypto finance. One major complaint is the perceived double standard—retail investors can still invest in U.S.-listed crypto ETFs, while institutions must stay away. This has led to renewed calls for regulatory updates that reflect today’s more mature digital asset ecosystem and align with international standards, especially those adopted in markets like the U.S.

Could this policy impact South Korea’s position in global crypto finance?

Yes. While South Korea has a vibrant retail crypto market, strict institutional rules could curb its long-term growth. Restricting financial firms from participating in crypto ETF investments might slow innovation and make the local market less attractive to international investors. As countries like the U.S. move toward greater institutional integration in digital finance, South Korea risks being left behind if it doesn’t modernize its rules. Many experts believe a policy update is essential to ensure the country stays competitive in the evolving crypto space.

FEATURED

EVENTS

Days
Hr
Min
Sec
 

ICN TALKS EPISODES