Apple link-out fees are back on the table. The company filed its proposed rates with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on Thursday, the same day the Supreme Court refused to pause the case. Apple wants 15% on purchases made through external links inside standard iOS apps. That is half the 30% it usually takes in in-app purchase fees.
Smaller developers would pay less. Apps enrolled in the Apple Small Business Program would owe 5%. The filing proposes 10% for apps in the Video Partner Program, the News Partner Program, and the Mini Apps Partner Program. Subscription renewals would drop to 10% as well.
What a link-out purchase looks like
Think of it this way. You open an app, tap a button that sends you to the developer’s own website, and buy the subscription there. Apple’s payment system never touches the money. Right now the company collects nothing on those sales in the United States, because the court barred it from charging anything. This filing is Apple’s argument for changing that.
How Apple link-out fees reached this point
The Epic Games lawsuit has run for years, and Apple won most of it. One piece went the other way. In 2021, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ordered Apple to stop blocking developers from pointing users toward outside payment options. Apple complied, then charged 27% on those purchases and set rules limiting how developers could present the links. Gonzalez Rogers found the company in contempt. She barred it from taking any cut at all.
The Ninth Circuit upheld the contempt finding but ruled a total ban went too far. It sent the fee question back to Gonzalez Rogers with instructions to tie the rate to the costs reasonably needed to coordinate external links.
Why the number could be zero
That instruction is where the fight now sits. Under a strict cost-only reading, Apple link-out fees would come to nothing, and Epic said publicly that Apple’s own filing concedes the point. Apple disputes the framing rather than the arithmetic. Its position is that a cost-only calculation ignores what the App Store provides developers, including the tools, technology and services behind app distribution. Epic opposes both the 15% and the 5% rates and argues Apple should not fold broad intellectual property valuations into the fee.
Apple pointed the court toward Google Play. Google charges 20% on link-outs for standard apps, 15% for apps in special programs and 10% on subscription renewals. Epic agreed to those rates. Apple link-out fees would sit under all three, and the company wants the judge to weigh that. Whether the comparison holds up is her call.
What happens next
Nothing changes yet. The zero-commission rule on external payment links stays in force until the court sets a new figure, and Apple’s separate appeal over the contempt ruling is still live at the Supreme Court. Epic will respond to the proposed App Store commission rates. If you run an app and moved checkout to the web this year, the Apple link-out fees on the table now are a proposal, not a bill.





