Skip to main content

icnlive

Menu

ICN.live

Tariq Al-Mansouri

Make us preferred on Google

  • 3 min read
  • Claude Opus 5 launched July 24, 2026, at the same price as Opus 4.8: $5 and $25 per million tokens.
  • Anthropic says it comes close to Fable 5’s intelligence at roughly half the price.
  • A new effort setting lets you trade depth for speed and token cost on each request.
  • It is now the default model on Claude Max and the strongest on Claude Pro.

The Claude Opus 5 release by Anthropic arrived on July 24, 2026, and it puts near-frontier intelligence on the same bill you were paying for Opus 4.8. Anthropic pitches the model as one you reach for every day. It comes close to the intelligence of Claude Fable 5, the company’s top public model, at roughly half the price, and it is now the default on Claude Max and the strongest option on Claude Pro. Think of it as the quick, capable sedan you drive daily rather than the race car you book for one hard lap. Cost sits at the center of the Claude Opus 5 release by Anthropic, and the Claude Opus 5 pricing is the surprise.

Standard use runs $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output tokens, the same rate as Opus 4.8 and half of Fable 5’s rate. A Fast mode runs about 2.5 times quicker at double the price. The headline feature is the Claude Opus 5 effort setting, a dial you turn per request. Set it low for routine calls and save tokens. Push it high when a problem needs full depth. Anthropic says the model holds quality at lower effort while spending fewer tokens than before, so your real bill can fall even as the price holds steady.

Claude Opus 5 vs Fable 5 on the benchmarks

The Claude Opus 5 release by Anthropic leans on value rather than raw peak scores. On the Claude Opus 5 benchmarks the company published, the model tops its own lineup on Frontier-Bench and GDPval-AA, though it still trails Mythos 5, the restricted top model, on cybersecurity work. The Claude Opus 5 vs Fable 5 comparison is where the case lands. On CursorBench 3.2 at max effort, Opus 5 comes within 0.5 percent of Fable 5’s peak at half the cost per task. ARC-AGI 3, a test of fresh problem-solving, shows a wider gap, with its score running three times the next-best model. For computer use, OSWorld 2.0 has it beating Fable 5’s best result at a third of the cost. Anthropic also reports lab gains, with organic chemistry scores 10.2 points above Opus 4.8 and protein-function predictions 7.7 points higher.

Where Claude Opus 5 coding pulls ahead

The clearest sign of progress turns up in Claude Opus 5 coding tests, where the model checks its own work and keeps going until it clears the task. Anthropic shares one Frontier-Bench job where it got a drawing of a machine part but no way to view it directly. Opus 5 wrote its own computer vision pipeline to read the geometry from raw pixels, then rebuilt the part. No rival model with the same setup solved it across five tries. Handed a real bug in a popular package manager, it traced the root cause and fixed an edge case the community patch had missed.

One engineer at a trading firm used it to build a market data feed for a new exchange in a single sitting, and with no live feed to test against, the model wrote its own test harness to confirm it read the data correctly. The Claude Opus 5 release by Anthropic also brought two beta features, letting developers switch tools mid-conversation without breaking the prompt cache and routing flagged API requests to another model instead of failing. This is the company’s fourth model in under two months, after Mythos 5, Fable 5, and Sonnet 5. If you have wanted a model you can run all day without watching the meter, Opus 5 is built for exactly that.

TAGS
  • AI Tools, Anthropic, Artificial Intelligence

EXPLORE MORE ON:

TechCapitalPoliticsBankingHealth
AI Agent Security Incident
Cybersecurity

OpenAI Traces the AI Agent Security Incident at Hugging Face to Its Models

The AI agent security incident that breached Hugging Face last week came from inside OpenAI’s own research systems,...
By Adnan Al-Jaziri3 min read
Meta AI infrastructure to Anthropic
META

Meta AI infrastructure to Anthropic: inside the $10 billion lease talks

The prospect of renting Meta AI infrastructure to Anthropic points to a fresh revenue line for the social...
By Khaled Darwish3 min read
Mira Murati's Inkling AI model
Mira Murati

Mira Murati’s Inkling AI model gives developers a free base to build on

Mira Murati’s Inkling AI model arrived this week, and it shifts who gets to shape a frontier system....
By Khaled Darwish3 min read
Saudi digital infrastructure
  • Saudi Arabia

Saudi digital infrastructure gained a fresh set of benchmarks this week, when the Communications, Space and Technology Commission released the Saudi Internet Report 2025. The fifth edition tracks how people in the Kingdom connect, browse, and use new tools. It reads as a status check on the network and the habits built on top of it.

What the Saudi Digital Infrastructure Report measured?

The report covers usage indicators across the Kingdom. CST is the government body that regulates the sector, so its figures guide operators and users alike. Median mobile internet download speed reached 216 Mbps, up from 203 Mbps a year earlier. That figure places Saudi Arabia among the top five G20 countries on this measure. Median speed is the midpoint, the value where half of connections run faster and half run slower. The 5G median download speed came in higher, at 320 Mbps, with latency of 24 milliseconds. Latency measures the delay before data starts to move, so a lower number means quicker response for calls and games.

Data use and time online

Mobile data consumption tells a similar story. Average mobile data consumption reached 53 GB per person each month, about three times the global average. Streaming, gaming, and video calls drive that volume. The report also found 61.3 percent of users spend seven hours or more online each day. Such heavy use rewards dense coverage and steady capacity.

Time online shapes demand on the network. When most users stay connected for long stretches, operators size their systems for peak load, not idle hours. The strength of Saudi digital infrastructure shows in speeds that hold up under that pressure. Consistent speed under load is the real test of any network.

Saudi Arabia AI adoption climbs

Saudi Arabia AI adoption stands out in the data. The report put the AI tool adoption rate among internet users at 45.2 percent, more than double the 21.5 percent recorded a year earlier. Take-up signals a faster embrace of generative tools, software that produces text, images, or code from a prompt. Women used AI tools more than men, at 52.8 percent against 39.4 percent. Adoption fell with age, from 58.4 percent among those aged 10 to 19 down to 14.8 percent among those 60 to 74.

ChatGPT ranked as the most downloaded AI application, followed by Google Gemini, DeepSeek, and Grok. The Kingdom’s own HUMAIN app placed tenth. Users turned to these tools to search for information, generate ideas, and support study.

Signs of a growing digital economy

Domain name registrations grew 18 percent over the year, a sign of more local sites and services. The report also mapped the fastest-growing applications, common browsing habits, and the most used search engines. These readings reflect wider local content and a larger digital economy.

Saudi digital infrastructure now supports one of the most connected populations in the region. Internet penetration in the Kingdom sat near 99.6 percent, so most residents already hold a connection. CST said the report forms part of its ongoing work to monitor the internet ecosystem and improve digital services. Together, the numbers sketch the state of Saudi digital infrastructure heading into 2026.

  • 3 min read
Claude Opus 5 release
  • Anthropic
  • 3 min read
Dubai Named World's Most Instagrammed City
  • Tourism

Dubai is the most photographed city in the world, according to a new ranking of how often destinations appear on social media and in search results.

The study comes from Players Time, which built a scoring system it calls an Instagrammability Score. It combines hashtag counts on Instagram and TikTok with monthly Google search volume, then scales the result from 0 to 100.

Dubai scored a perfect 100. The city has been tagged 147 million times on Instagram and more than 43 million times on TikTok. It draws 3.43 million Google searches a month.

The Burj Khalifa took first place in the separate landmarks ranking. The tower has 10.1 million tagged posts and 1.1 million monthly searches. That puts it well ahead of the Grand Canyon at 696,000 searches and the Eiffel Tower at 662,000.

That result is worth sitting with. The Burj Khalifa opened in 2010. It is now photographed and searched more than monuments that have been standing for centuries. The Eiffel Tower came second with a score of 73.22. The Taj Mahal and Machu Picchu both landed in the top group, with search volumes between roughly 854,000 and 928,000 a month.

Europe holds 8 of the top 20 landmark places. The Sagrada Familia and the Colosseum sit in that group, with monthly searches running from about 313,000 to 737,000.

Some places are ranked for the experience, not the building

A few entries in the landmarks list are not really buildings at all.

Shibuya Scramble Crossing in Tokyo generated more than 6.57 million posts. Up to 3,000 people cross at once, and most of the photos are taken from inside the crowd rather than from a viewing point. Times Square in New York works the same way, with 5.82 million posts.

The oddest entry is the DUMBO viewpoint near the Brooklyn Bridge, which has passed 4 million Instagram posts on its own. Search demand for it is modest. People are not planning trips there. They walk past, take the photo, and the number keeps climbing.

London posts more, Barcelona searches more

Among cities, London and Paris follow Dubai. London recorded the highest raw hashtag volume in the study at 192.2 million posts. New York City reached 165.6 million and Istanbul 153.7 million.

Barcelona is the outlier. The city recorded 97 million tagged posts and 23 million monthly Google searches, which is close to seven times Dubai’s search volume.

That figure deserves a caveat the study does not offer. “Barcelona” is also the name of one of the most followed football clubs on the planet. A raw keyword count cannot tell a fan looking for match results apart from a traveller looking for a hotel. The same problem may explain why San Diego, Santiago and Kochi appear in a ranking of visual destinations despite far lower travel profiles.

Players Time has not published the weighting behind its score, so the gap between hashtag volume and search demand is difficult to check independently. Hashtag counts are also self-reported by the platforms and change constantly.

The Dubai finding survives those questions better than most. The city leads on both measures at once, and it does so against capitals that have had a hundred years’ head start on accumulating images. The Burj Khalifa did the same thing at landmark level in sixteen years.

  • 3 min read
Load More News

Share this post

on your favourite social platforms

or copy the link