• bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
  • ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
  • tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
  • bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
  • solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
  • xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
  • usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
  • staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
  • cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
  • avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
  • bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
    ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
    tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
    bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
    solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
    xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
    usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
    staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
    cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
    avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
image-alt-1BTC Dominance: 58.93%
image-alt-2 ETH Dominance: 12.89%
image-alt-3 BTC/ETH Ratio: 26.62%
image-alt-4 Total Market Cap 24h: $2.51T
image-alt-5Volume 24h: $144.96B
image-alt-6 ETH Gas Price: 5.1 Gwei
 

MORE FROM SPONSORED

LIVE Web3 News

 

ARTICLE INFORMATION

XRP's legal battle with SEC ends

XRP’s legal battle with the SEC ends as both parties drop appeals

Adnan Al-Jaziri

XRP’s legal battle with the SEC ends following a significant mutual decision to abandon all appeals.

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse confirmed the move on X, stating, “Ripple is dropping our cross appeal, and the SEC is expected to drop their appeal.” This agreement concludes one of the most watched regulatory clashes in the crypto world. After years of courtroom drama, both Ripple and the SEC seem ready to turn the page.

The roots of the dispute trace back to December 2020, when the SEC accused Ripple of conducting unregistered securities offerings by selling XRP tokens. The long-awaited judgment in July 2023 provided a mixed outcome. The court ruled XRP sales on public exchanges didn’t breach securities laws, but Ripple’s institutional sales did. The penalty? A $125 million fine and a permanent injunction preventing similar future sales.

Ripple and the SEC had attempted to negotiate a reduced penalty of $50 million. However, Judge Analisa Torres rejected the proposal. She ruled that the court couldn’t approve such a reduction without meeting high legal thresholds, which both parties failed to demonstrate.

Final chapter in a defining case for crypto regulation

XRP’s legal battle with the SEC ends in a way that emphasizes regulatory clarity over further confrontation. Garlinghouse expressed the company’s desire to move forward and focus on innovation, particularly their vision of building the “Internet of Value.” This sentiment reflects a broader shift in the crypto industry. Regulatory uncertainty has long clouded projects and investments.

Interestingly, the SEC’s retreat in this case coincides with a changing enforcement tone. In recent months, lawsuits against other crypto giants such as Coinbase, Binance, and Kraken have also been dropped. Analysts view this as a sign of the SEC’s softened stance under the Trump administration.

ANOTHER MUST-WATCH ON ICN.LIVE:


Ripple sets sights on future growth in a changing crypto landscape

With XRP’s legal battle with the SEC finally sealed, Ripple aims to redirect resources toward innovation and expansion. The conclusion of this case may also influence how other blockchain companies approach compliance and litigation.

Ripple’s resolution might encourage institutional investors to return to XRP. With clearer regulatory boundaries, companies now have a precedent for navigating future enforcement challenges.

Crypto advocates hope this signifies a step toward a more structured and fair regulatory environment. As Ripple closes this chapter, the industry watches closely to see whether the SEC continues this trend of easing its grip.

SHARE

What does the end of XRP’s legal battle with the SEC mean for Ripple?

The end of XRP’s legal battle with the SEC marks a pivotal shift for Ripple. By dropping its cross appeal, and with the SEC expected to follow suit, Ripple is signaling a desire to move forward from legal distractions. This allows the company to refocus its efforts on developing and expanding its blockchain solutions, particularly its vision for an Internet of Value. With regulatory uncertainty reduced, Ripple can now engage more confidently with partners, investors, and customers. It also sets a precedent for how similar crypto firms might resolve legal conflicts with regulators going forward.

Why did Ripple and the SEC drop their appeals?

Both Ripple and the SEC dropped their appeals to bring closure to a lengthy and high-profile lawsuit. After Judge Torres rejected their joint motion to reduce Ripple’s penalty from $125 million to $50 million, the parties likely saw limited benefit in continuing the legal fight. Dropping the appeals avoids additional legal costs and allows both sides to pivot. For Ripple, it’s about resuming business growth; for the SEC, it aligns with what appears to be a broader softening of enforcement actions against major crypto firms under the current U.S. administration.

How does this affect the broader crypto market?

The settlement may have significant implications for the broader crypto market. With XRP’s legal battle resolved, investors and developers may feel more confident in participating in the crypto ecosystem. The case sets a partial precedent: public XRP sales weren’t securities, but institutional ones were. This mixed ruling provides some legal guidance. Additionally, with the SEC also backing off lawsuits against other crypto exchanges recently, it suggests a regulatory thaw. Companies now have a clearer idea of what the SEC views as a violation, allowing for more informed decision-making.

Is XRP now considered a safe investment?

While no crypto asset is risk-free, the end of the SEC lawsuit against Ripple removes a major overhang for XRP. Regulatory clarity, even partial, generally boosts investor confidence. However, XRP remains subject to market volatility and future regulatory changes. Still, with the lawsuit behind it, Ripple’s strategic initiatives can progress without legal distractions. This may lead to broader adoption and possibly an improved perception among institutional investors. As always, investors should conduct thorough research and consider both market and regulatory risks before investing.

FEATURED

EVENTS

Days
Hr
Min
Sec
 

ICN TALKS EPISODES