• bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
  • ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
  • tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
  • bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
  • solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
  • xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
  • usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
  • staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
  • cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
  • avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
  • bitcoinBitcoin (BTC) $ 42,977.00 0.18%
    ethereumEthereum (ETH) $ 2,365.53 1.12%
    tetherTether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.2%
    bnbBNB (BNB) $ 302.66 0.19%
    solanaSolana (SOL) $ 95.44 1.28%
    xrpXRP (XRP) $ 0.501444 0.1%
    usd-coinUSDC (USDC) $ 0.996294 0.34%
    staked-etherLido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,367.26 1.4%
    cardanoCardano (ADA) $ 0.481226 2.68%
    avalanche-2Avalanche (AVAX) $ 34.37 1.19%
image-alt-1BTC Dominance: 58.93%
image-alt-2 ETH Dominance: 12.89%
image-alt-3 BTC/ETH Ratio: 26.62%
image-alt-4 Total Market Cap 24h: $2.51T
image-alt-5Volume 24h: $144.96B
image-alt-6 ETH Gas Price: 5.1 Gwei
 

MORE FROM SPONSORED

LIVE Web3 News

 

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Meta shareholders reject Bitcoin plan

Meta shareholders reject Bitcoin plan despite crypto advocates’ push

Leila Al-Khatib

Meta shareholders reject Bitcoin plan amid rising interest in corporate crypto strategies.

During Meta’s annual meeting on May 30, shareholders overwhelmingly voted against a proposal to add Bitcoin to the company’s $72 billion cash reserve. The measure received only 3.92 million votes in favor versus a staggering 4.98 billion against. This landslide rejection shows how resistant major corporations still are to adopting Bitcoin as a treasury asset.

The initiative, submitted by Ethan Peck of the National Center for Public Policy Research, suggested converting part of Meta’s surplus cash into Bitcoin. Peck described the move as a strategy to hedge inflation, citing Bitcoin’s 2024 price rally compared to minimal bond returns. Despite the pitch, support was nearly non-existent.

Bitcoin fails to win over blue-chip boards

Meta shareholders reject Bitcoin plan even after high-profile support and public lobbying. Matt Cole, CEO of Strive Asset Management, urged Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to adopt a Bitcoin strategy. His call came during the 2025 Bitcoin Conference, branding it a bold corporate move.

Crypto industry watchers like Bloomberg’s Eric Balchunas also speculated that Meta could lead this cycle’s Bitcoin treasury wave. Yet, the actual shareholder vote reflects traditional corporate caution. Abstentions totaled nearly 9 million shares, and over 200 million votes were withheld, indicating disinterest or confusion rather than outright opposition.

ANOTHER MUST-READ ON ICN.LIVE:

Japan’s national quantum strategy boosted by QuEra hybrid computing launch

Institutional conservatism trumps innovation

Meta shareholders reject Bitcoin plan, joining Microsoft and Amazon in similar past votes. Bitcoin advocates face consistent resistance from blue-chip firms. Corporate finance leaders remain reluctant to deviate from established treasury practices. The proposal didn’t define how much Bitcoin Meta should hold, which may have further eroded support.

Treasury departments are risk-averse by design. While Bitcoin has grown in legitimacy, especially with ETF approvals and institutional adoption, it’s still volatile. For now, the appetite for using it in balance sheets remains low.

Future battles are likely despite rejection

Meta shareholders reject Bitcoin plan, but the pressure from Bitcoin supporters will continue. As regulatory clarity improves and macroeconomic shifts challenge bond yields, corporate Bitcoin adoption may become more attractive. Today’s rejection isn’t the end—it’s part of a long campaign.

Crypto proponents will likely return with new proposals at next year’s meetings. With more education and better market tools, blue-chip firms might eventually warm to the idea. But for now, tradition holds the upper hand.

SHARE

Why did Meta shareholders reject the Bitcoin treasury proposal?

Meta shareholders rejected the Bitcoin plan primarily due to its lack of specificity and the inherent volatility of Bitcoin. The proposal didn’t state how much of Meta’s $72 billion cash reserve would be allocated. Shareholders and financial officers typically prefer low-risk, stable investments like bonds and short-term treasuries. With Bitcoin still subject to large price swings, the risk seemed too high for a company of Meta’s scale. Even though inflation and low bond yields were part of the argument, most voters weren’t convinced it was worth the potential downside.

Who submitted the Bitcoin proposal and what was the motivation?

The proposal was submitted by Ethan Peck from the National Center for Public Policy Research. His motivation was to provide Meta with a hedge against inflation and low bond returns. He highlighted Bitcoin’s strong performance in 2024 as a compelling case for diversification. This idea isn’t new—many crypto advocates believe that companies should store value in Bitcoin rather than in fiat currencies or bonds. Peck hoped that a large company like Meta adopting Bitcoin could signal confidence and boost broader corporate adoption.

Was there any notable support for adding Bitcoin to Meta’s treasury?

Yes, though it was minimal in voting terms. Matt Cole, CEO of Strive Asset Management, publicly advocated for the proposal. He even contacted Mark Zuckerberg directly during the 2025 Bitcoin Conference to push for what he called a “bold” Bitcoin treasury strategy. Additionally, Eric Balchunas from Bloomberg speculated Meta could lead the Bitcoin cycle for megacap firms. Despite this, support didn’t translate into shareholder votes. It shows a disconnect between public advocacy and actual investor confidence.

What happens next after the proposal was rejected?

While the proposal was voted down, this is unlikely to be the end of the discussion. Bitcoin proponents will probably continue pushing similar ideas at Meta and other companies. The more Bitcoin gains institutional acceptance, the more viable these proposals may become in the future. As regulatory frameworks solidify and more companies explore tokenized finance, we could see another vote down the line—this time with better education, clearer risk metrics, and perhaps stronger backing.

FEATURED

EVENTS

Days
Hr
Min
Sec
 

ICN TALKS EPISODES